Question 1 of 10 · Hazard identification
How does your organisation identify psychosocial hazards across roles, teams, and locations?
- We have not formally identified psychosocial hazards.
- Identification happens ad hoc when incidents surface.
- We have a documented register reviewed at least annually.
- A live hazard register is maintained per role and team with named owners.
Question 2 of 10 · Risk assessment
How are identified psychosocial hazards assessed for likelihood and impact?
- No structured risk assessment is performed.
- Informal assessment by line managers, no consistent method.
- Documented assessment using a defined likelihood-impact framework.
- Assessments are role-specific, documented, and reviewed on a defined cadence.
Question 3 of 10 · Control hierarchy
When a hazard is identified, how are controls selected and recorded?
- Controls are decided case by case with no documentation.
- Controls are documented but not ranked by the hierarchy of control.
- Controls follow the hierarchy of control with documented rationale.
- Controls follow the hierarchy with named owners, review dates, and evidence anchors.
Question 4 of 10 · Worker consultation
How are workers consulted about psychosocial hazards and the controls in force?
- No formal worker consultation occurs.
- Consultation happens occasionally, no records kept.
- Consultation occurs on a regular cadence with minutes or notes retained.
- Consultation is structured, documented, and feeds back into the hazard register.
Question 5 of 10 · Documentation
If a SafeWork inspector requested your psychosocial-hazards evidence pack tomorrow, what could you produce?
- We could not assemble a coherent pack inside a week.
- We could assemble fragments from multiple systems given a few days.
- We could produce a structured pack inside one business day.
- A current evidence pack is maintained and exportable on demand.
Question 6 of 10 · Leadership reporting
How frequently does the executive or board receive psychosocial-risk reporting?
- Psychosocial risk is not reported at executive or board level.
- Ad hoc reporting when an incident or complaint occurs.
- Standing report at least twice a year with hazard and control data.
- Quarterly or more frequent reporting with named owners and trend data.
Question 7 of 10 · Training
What psychosocial-hazards training is in place for managers and workers?
- No psychosocial-hazards training is delivered.
- One-off awareness sessions, no completion records.
- Structured training with completion tracked for relevant roles.
- Role-specific training with refresh cycles and competency verification.
Question 8 of 10 · Incident response
When a psychosocial-hazard incident or complaint is raised, what happens?
- Response is handled informally by the nearest manager.
- There is a process but it is inconsistently applied.
- Documented response process is followed with case notes retained.
- Documented process with named accountabilities, timelines, and post-incident review.
Question 9 of 10 · Review cadence
How often is the psychosocial-hazards management approach reviewed and refreshed?
- It is not reviewed on any defined cadence.
- Reviewed only when a regulatory change or incident triggers it.
- Reviewed at least annually against current WHS guidance.
- Reviewed on a defined cadence with outcomes feeding into the operating plan.
Question 10 of 10 · Evidence package
If asked to demonstrate due diligence to a regulator, board, or insurer, how prepared is your evidence trail?
- We have no consolidated evidence trail.
- Evidence exists across systems but is not consolidated.
- A consolidated evidence pack exists and is updated periodically.
- A defensible, current evidence pack is maintained and exportable on demand.
Enable JavaScript to take the interactive audit, or
contact the team directly.